CDRC Claim, Dispute, Resolution and Consultancy

Insights

Notes on contract practice in Nepal.

The clauses, the arithmetic and the evidence that decide construction claims — written by the people who prepare them.

One flood, two doors: routing the Rasuwa claims through force majeure and Employer's Risk

Physical damage, prevention and the supply chain each travel a different route. FIDIC 1999, the MDB Harmonised Edition, FIDIC 2017 and the ENAA Model Form, read with the law of Nepal.

Roshan Bhatta and Sanjeev Koirala

September 2026
Force majeure, exceptional events and change of circumstances in construction contracts

A practical guide to PPMO, FIDIC 1999, the MDB Harmonised Edition 2010 and FIDIC 2017 — why a disaster is not automatically an entitlement, and what the record has to show.

Mr Sanjeev Koirala and Mr Roshan Bhatta

September 2026
Time-bar clauses for construction claims: a Nepal law perspective

A notice provision that is procedural in form can extinguish a substantive right. When Nepal law will enforce it, and the three layers of time limit a claimant has to observe.

Roshan Bhatta and Manasvi Koirala

September 2026
Whose time is it anyway? Who owns the float in the programme

The Engineer rejects an extension of time because the activity “had float”. The Contractor says the float was its own. What the Protocol, the standard forms and the authorities actually say.

Sanjeev Koirala and Bishan Subedi

September 2026
The award of interest where the Engineer under-certifies

A certificate paid on time is later revised upwards by a tribunal. Does interest run from the original due date? FIDIC 1999 and 2017, and the position in Nepal.

Manasvi Koirala and Diwasha Acharya

September 2026

Want a piece on something specific?

If a clause or a calculation keeps causing trouble on your project, tell us and we will write about it.

Get in touch